Hee Cheng V Krishnan Case Summary

Lee bee eng formerly trading as afco east development v cheng william 2020 sghc 207 civil procedure parties civil procedure rules of court civil procedure striking out decision date.

Hee cheng v krishnan case summary. On 15 march 1996 the first plaintiff agreed to purchase from the defendant a piece of property wisma pantai kuala lumpur. Krishnan attempts to transfer tol land. Mydin mohamed v kunji mohidin co holder cannot sue each other mohammed said v. By nur farhana binti abdul karim nur izzati binti mohd shaiful bahri nur syahirah binti mohamad tahir leb120075 leb120076 leb120077.

Krishnan 1955 mlj 103 the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement for the sale and purchase of the plaintiff s house built upon a land in respect of which the defendant was the holder of a temporary occupation license. Krishnan unlawful action paruvathy v. Brooks hire of. 2003 6 mlj 658.

The example case is in the case of kok hok leong anor v. Facts of the case plaintiff claimed for specific performance and alternatively damages for breach of a contract which was entered between plaintiff and also defendant. In the case of derry v peek 1889. May rent out house govindaraju v.

C fraudulent palaniappa. E immoral against public policy pearce v. In this case the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant to purchase a house built by the defendant on the ground temporary occupation license. 01 oct 2020 beyonics asia pacific ltd and others v goh chan peng and another 2020 sghc i 20.

D involves implies injury to person property. Krishnan no transfer of license terminated upon death. Hee cheng v krishnan. Fatimah cannot sue license expired cannot assign to others hee cheng v.

B of such nature as to defeat the law tan bing hock attempts to assign logging rights. Insyirah mohamad noh land law i cases 2 hee cheng v krishnan 1955 1 mlj 103 the plaintiff in this case claimed for specific performance or alternatively for damages for a breach of contract entered into between him and the defendant for the purchase of a house built upon a piece of land in respect of which a temporary occupation licence was issued. Seow kah cheng anor. Amounts to an attempt to sell and purchase rights under temporary occupation licences and is therefore unlawful which can be refereed to the case of hee cheng v krishnan.

In the case of hee cheng v krishnan 1955 where this case concern where the plaintiff had claimed for specific performance and alternatively damages for breach of an alleged contract that have been entered into between them to sell the defendant s right in a tol land a house built on the land. Hee cheng v krishnan contract btw p and d to sell d s right in tol land to p d later breach the contract and p sue for specific performance held the ctt was an attempt to transfer the tol must fail for being unlawful and against the s24 of contract ordinance.