Loh Kooi Choon V Government Of Malaysia Summary

Government of malaysia 1 1 save feedback loh kooi choon v.

Loh kooi choon v government of malaysia summary. The case of loh kooi choon v government of malaysia was referred to. Loh kooi choon v gov of m sia. Government of malaysia loh kooi choon v government of malaysia 1977 2 mlj 187 is a case decided in the federal court of malaysia concerning the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution and also involving the extent to which parliament can amend the constitution. Government of malaysia 1977 2 mlj 187 is a case decided in the federal court of malaysia concerning the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution and also involving the extent to which parliament can amend the constitution.

The appellant argued that an amendment of the constitution is invalid if any provision in it is inconsistent with the constitution. The decision was delivered by federal justice raja azlan shah. Loh kooi choon v government of malaysia 1977 2 mlj 187 is a case decided in the federal court of malaysia concerning the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution and also involving the extent to which parliament can amend the constitution. The case of loh kooi choon v government of malaysia 1977 2 mlj 187 in which where the federal court turned down the argument that the federal constitution as the supreme law of the land cannot be inconsistent with itself.

Loh kooi choon v government of malaysia 1977 2 mlj 187 is a case decided in the federal court of malaysia concerning the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution and also involving the extent to which parliament can amend the constitution. The decision was delivered by federal justice raja azlan shah. Loh kooi choon v government of malaysia. Phang chin hock v pp held.

Loh kooi choon v. It was stated by the court that the question whether or not the impugned act is harsh and unjust is just a question of policy to be debated and decided by parliament and therefore not fit for judicial determination. The decision was delivered by federal justice raja azlan shah. This case concerned the rights and freedoms assured by the constitution and also raised the question that to what extent the parliament can amend the constitution.

The decision was delivered by. Constitution as the supreme law unchangeable by ordinary means is distinct from ordinary law and as such cannot be inconsistent with itself. 10 28 2017 loh kooi choon v. Based on dicey s first postulate in the rule of law malaysia may assure the rule of law in the case of loh kooi choon v government of malaysia 1977.

2 hi oya ighnes ulta zla hah ribute for as was said by lord macnaghten in vacher sons ltd v london society of compositors 1913 ac 107 118. Some people may think the policy of the act unwise and even dangerous to the community.