Kerpa Singh V Bariam Singh 1966

In this case of kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 past consideration are determine.

Kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966. The federal court held that since the creditor had accepted the offer by cashing the cheque and retaining the money he agreed to discharge the debtor from any further liability. For example in the case of kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 the defendant own rm8 869. In order to settle the debt the defendant son offer a cheque to plaintiff rm4 000 in full settlement for his father debt. The debtor s son wrote a letter to kerpa singh offering rm4000 in full satisfaction of his father s debt and endorsed a cheque for the amount stipulating that should kerpa singh refuse to accept his proposal he must return the cheque.

Bariam singh owed kerpa singh rm8 869 94 under the judgement debt. The acceptance of the cheque in full satisfaction prevent them. The debtor made an arrangement to settle lump sum payment by paying a lesser amount. Bariam singh 1966 1 mlj 38 facts.

Accounting information system cia2002 uploaded by. It can be illustrated in the case of kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 the debtor s son offered to give a cheque of rm4000 as full payment in order to discharge his father from a debt of rm 8650. The plaintiffs cash the cheque and demand for the balance of the debt. Kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 part payment of debt may discharge an obligation facts.

The defendant bariam singh owned kerpa singh as plaintiff rm 8869 94 under the judgement debt. Kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 1 mlj. Fisher v bell case notes and summary hubungan etnik. The debtor s son wrote a letter to kerpa singh offering rm4000 in full satisfaction of his father s debt and endorsed a cheque for the amount stipulating that should kerpa singh refuse to accept his proposal he must return the cheque.

Nota sejarah tingkatan 4 bab 4 lia 1001 legal method ruling. Kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 facts. Bariam singh owed kerpa singh rm8 869 94 under the judgement debt. The federal court ruled that as the plaintiff cash the cheque.

In kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 where the debtor took loan from the creditor. The debtor s son wrote a letter to kerpa singh ofering rm4000 in full satisaction on his father s debt and endorsed a. Past consideration is where one promise is made subsequent to an in return for an act that has already been performed. Kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 1 mlj.

The promise is made on account of a past consideration. Bariam singh owed kerpa singh rm8 869 94 under the judgement debt.