Section 64 Contract Act 1950 Cases
Section 64 4 of the lra suggests that the employee can refer the dispute to the ccma or a bargaining council and the referring party may require the employer not to unilaterally implement the change to the terms and conditions of employment or if the employer has already implemented the change unilaterally the referring party may require the employer to restore the terms and conditions.
Section 64 contract act 1950 cases. The administering contract in the enactment in malaysia is the contracts act 1950 act 136 overhauled 1974. Consequences of rescission of voidable contract section. Under the law section 40 and 76 of the contracts act 1950 it constitutes that discharge by breach means when a party to a contract has refused to perform or disabled himself from performing his promise in its entirety the promise may put an end to the contract unless he has signified by words or conduct his acquiescence in its continuance and a person who rightly rescinds a contract is. Illustration b and c to section 64 of contracts act 1950 part payment of a debt has an effect to discharge the full debt.
The case regarding section 64 of contracts act 1950 is associated pan malaysia cement sdn bhd v syarikat teknikal kejuruteraan sdn bhd 1990. As it were an agreement is an assertion which legitimately ties two or more gatherings together. Of contingent contracts section 32. It can be illustrated in the case of kerpa singh v bariam singh 1966 the debtor s son offered to give a cheque of rm4000 as full payment in order to discharge his father from a debt of rm 8650.
Promisee may dispense with or remit performance of promise 65. An act relating to contracts. Act 136 contracts act 1950. Legislation from this website is not a copy of the gazette printed by the government printer percetakan nasional malaysia berhad for the purposes of section 61 of the interpretation acts 1948 and 1967 act 388 and does not constitute prima facie evidence of the contents of the gazette by virtue of the section.